Blog Trust
Who Is Actually Winning the AI War? The One Thing China and Trump Agree On
The trigger
On September 12, 2026, Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei published a post asking every frontier lab to slow the pace of capability advances. We covered that argument in its own short. What happened next is the story here. Within a day, the two governments that matter most for AI both said no, for opposite stated reasons.
China’s answer
China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said fearmongering, confrontation, and vicious competition would only disrupt the process of global AI governance, and served no one’s interest. Chinese state media went further and called the slowdown proposal a Cold War tactic, framing an American lab’s safety plea as a move to freeze China’s progress in place.
Trump’s answer
President Trump, in the same news cycle, dismissed proposed AI guardrails as a “SICK conspiracy” against AI and data centers. His stated logic was competitive rather than governance: the US is leading China in AI, he said, and he wants to keep it that way, “because whoever wins AI wins.” One side hears a plot to slow China. The other hears a plot to slow America. Both keep their foot on the pedal.
The summit
A Trump and Xi summit with AI on the agenda was reported for September 24, 2026, days after these statements. That makes the timing hard to read as coincidence. Each government is signaling, before the meeting, that it will not be the first to slow down.
Why it matters for the stack
Safety proposals from labs only bind the labs that adopt them. The pace of frontier AI is set by whoever refuses to pause, and right now both superpowers have said out loud that they will not. Whatever you think of Amodei’s argument, the practical answer to “who is winning” is that the race is winning, and the people building on these models should plan for capability to keep arriving faster than rules do.
Sources: Reuters on China’s state media response, CNBC on the Foreign Ministry statement, and the Washington Post on Trump’s remarks.
Common questions
- What did China actually say?
- Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said fearmongering, confrontation, and vicious competition would only disrupt global AI governance. Chinese state media separately called the slowdown call a Cold War tactic.
- What did Trump say?
- He dismissed new AI guardrails as a 'SICK conspiracy' against AI and data centers, and said the US is leading China in AI and he wants to keep it that way, 'because whoever wins AI wins.'
- Who is winning?
- Nobody has a scoreboard. Both governments are betting that speed beats caution, which means the pace is set by the race itself rather than by any safety argument.